| integer on 24 Feb 2001 10:33:45 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| [Nettime-bold] net art history (!ngezt) |
olia lialina <olialia@televisie.org>
>Pit Schultz:
>
>
>> to demand now, why not more artists are put into the heaven of
>> net-dot-art is understandable but neverteless futile. we speak already
>> about the past. of course one can try to overwrite history, by inventing
>> a genre of 'artistic software' and neglect that groups like jodi or iod
>> for example started a whole "do it yourself - school" of understanding
>> code and the visual layers plus its social context as one thing,
>> tactically including bits of programming language. an approach now
>> very viral on the microsound levels of electronic music.
>
>
>Yes, very true.
Pit Schultz is likely the quintessential example of an inkompetent
pop.tart male imbecile.
jodi [inkompetent pop.tartz++] copy pasted most =cw4t7abs data.
=cw4t7abs kode = existed prior to british gov sponsored iod
which lacks in any case.
Pit Schultz like imbeciles e.g. `critics` comme geert lovink,
tilman baumgaertel etc whose m9nd aktivity resembles that of a housefly -
only understand the trivial hence the state of things -
01 amalgam of financially + .bio destitute house flies
following refuse - i.e. each other.
>integer@www.god-emil.dk wrote:
>
>> nn opinie it = the most intelligent + interessant data outputted by olia
>> lialina [second being ascii paparazzi]
>
>natalja, ti stanovish'sa sentimental'noj. ja ne uznaju tebia
konzum>zntmntl.g!glb!tz. du != d!fr ver!.
Tilman Baumgaertel <tilman_baumgaertel@csi.com> - lo.tekk kr!ket begd
>hallo
>
>thanks for all the info. Very interesting. I've been thinking for years
>that somebody should do something like that, The screenshots look great.
>
>Unfortunately all doesn't replace personal experience of the
>piece/workofart/programm. I need to know that it works, unlike projects
>like "earshot",
earshot - another excellent example of occident males in flight.
permit someone to smile at the aerodynamics + aesthetics.
not to mention the imbeciles stole my copyright information.
+ 1 abs must peruse their vocab - ist .uk 01 immense pub oder quoi +?
drunken illiterate plebeians.
>and what the effect is on the user.
opinie = we already know. + your dilettantish observations arent desired. ne + ne.
http://www.eusocial.com/nato.0+55+3d/242.nn.html
>So I need a copy of the
>thing. I don't have a mac, but could arrange for one.
desire != okupaz!on. please insert addtl koins kriket.
just 1 klik your flight - http://www.eusocial.com
>Btw, did you consider to open source the whole thing?
unsanitary open sore +? smile++ _
>Or are you trying to
>sell it?
am not attempting to. i am.
+ you cannot afford it. financially nor intellectually.
kompassionat smile 2 01 amalgam of financially + .bio destitute fruit flies.
nn
nn.o1 - op!n!e zvp +?
nn.o2 - its good + violent. transmit - yes.
nn.o1 - kl!!!!!!!!k
-
pre.konssept!Øn
meeTz ver!f1kat!Øn.
Netochka Nezvanova
f3.MASCHIN3NKUNST
@www.eusocial.com
17.hzV.tRL.478
e
|
| +----------
| | <
\\----------------+ | n2t
| >
e
_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold